top of page

Allie Beth Stuckey and Raymond Ibrahim Discuss the Meaning of Islamic Jihad on “Relatable”


Top Points

  • Jihad Has Dual Meanings: Allie Beth Stuckey and Raymond Ibrahim explained that jihad can mean either a personal spiritual struggle or, historically, physical warfare to expand or defend Islamic rule.

  • Extremists Use Jihad to Justify Violence: Ibrahim noted that radical groups like al-Qaeda, ISIS, and Hamas have long used the militant interpretation of jihad to legitimize violence and power struggles.

  • Understanding Jihad Requires Moral Clarity: Both emphasized that the West must confront the ideology behind jihad honestly and that Christians should respond with truth, courage, and discernment rooted in faith.


Full Report:

On a recent episode of Relatable, host Allie Beth Stuckey sat down with historian and author Raymond Ibrahim to discuss one of the most misunderstood concepts in modern discourse: Islamic jihad. Known for his expertise on Islamic history and ideology, Ibrahim provided historical context and theological clarity on what jihad means, how it has evolved, and why understanding it is vital to addressing modern extremism and cultural conflict.


Understanding What Jihad Really Means

Stuckey began the episode by asking Ibrahim to explain how the word “jihad” is used in both Islamic texts and modern politics. Ibrahim said that jihad, which literally means “struggle” in Arabic, has two primary interpretations. The first is an inner, spiritual struggle for personal virtue and obedience to God. The second, which has been dominant historically, refers to physical warfare against non-Muslims to expand or defend Islamic rule.


He explained that while many Muslims understand jihad in a personal or moral sense, radical movements throughout history have emphasized the militant interpretation. From the early Islamic conquests to modern terrorist groups, Ibrahim said, jihad has often been used to justify violence in the name of faith.


Stuckey noted that Western audiences often hesitate to discuss the topic because of political correctness or fear of stereotyping, but she emphasized the importance of distinguishing between peaceful Muslims and extremist ideologies that exploit religion for power.


Historical and Modern Context

Ibrahim provided an overview of how jihad shaped Islamic expansion throughout history, beginning in the 7th century. He said that the rapid spread of Islam through military conquest, from the Middle East to North Africa, Spain, and parts of Asia, was not simply a matter of faith but of power and dominance.


He contrasted this historical reality with the way jihad is often portrayed today as purely spiritual. While that interpretation exists, he said, it does not erase centuries of conflict rooted in the political and militant dimensions of the term. He also explained that the concept of jihad still influences modern groups like al-Qaeda, ISIS, and Hamas, which invoke it to frame their violence as religious duty.


Stuckey asked how the West should understand this in light of ongoing global tensions. Ibrahim responded that acknowledging the theological and historical reality of jihad is not about condemning Muslims but about understanding what drives extremist ideology. He said that you cannot solve a problem you refuse to define.


Faith, Clarity, and the Modern West

The discussion turned to how Christians and Western societies should respond to the rise of jihadist movements and the moral confusion surrounding them. Stuckey emphasized the need for clarity and conviction rooted in truth rather than fear or guilt. She noted that cultural relativism often prevents honest conversations about religion, violence, and belief.


Ibrahim agreed, saying that the West’s hesitance to address religious ideology has allowed extremism to persist unchallenged. He said that while political and military strategies are necessary, the real battle is ideological, requiring a moral framework strong enough to confront religious violence without compromising truth or compassion.


Both Stuckey and Ibrahim highlighted that Christians should respond with both wisdom and courage. Understanding jihad in its full context, they said, allows believers to engage the world more effectively, promoting peace while standing firm in biblical truth.


Conclusion

In this episode of Relatable, Allie Beth Stuckey and Raymond Ibrahim shed light on the complex meaning of Islamic jihad and its historical roots. Their conversation revealed that while jihad can refer to personal spiritual struggle, it has also served as a justification for violence throughout history and remains a defining idea in modern extremism.


For listeners, the episode offered a timely reminder that truth and moral clarity are essential in confronting the ideological challenges of the modern world. By seeking to understand jihad honestly and historically, Christians and all citizens can better engage with issues of faith, culture, and security.


References


bottom of page